[Modeling] Modeling an Agent Class- register your opinion
James Odell
email@jamesodell.com
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:00:40 -0400
--Caste - 1 vote
--Agent Class or Agent Type - 7 votes (one with the constraint of using
Classier)
--Agent - 1 vote
--"No idea" - 1 vote
On 6/23/03 5:45 PM, "Stephen Cranefield" indited:
> Jim Odell wrote:
>> OK, the tally is now:
>>
>> --Caste - 1 vote
>> --Agent Class or Agent Type - 5 votes
>> --Agent - 1 vote
>> --"The term agent class is 'misfortune'" - 1 vote
>> --"No idea" - 1 vote
>
> I favour AgentType if we decide to use a metaclass that is a direct subclass
> of Classifier (i.e. not a subclass of Class). Otherwise, AgentClass would
> be appropriate.
>
> I also think that we should start developing a metamodel in which the agent
> type metaclass *is* a new subclass of Classifier. If we later discover that
> it really can fit under Class then we can refactor the metamodel.
>
> - Stephen
> _______________________________________________
> Modeling mailing list
> Modeling@www.fipa.org
> http://fipa.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling